Economic Finesse
  • Business
  • Stock
  • Politics
  • Investing
No Result
View All Result
  • Business
  • Stock
  • Politics
  • Investing
No Result
View All Result
Economic Finesse
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

On immigration, Trump’s the one depending on vibes

October 12, 2024
in Politics
On immigration, Trump’s the one depending on vibes

Polls are coming fast and furious now, with just over three weeks remaining before the November election. The Wall Street Journal released a set on Friday morning, evaluating how voters in swing states viewed the candidacies of Vice President Kamala Harris and former president Donald Trump. As with most other such polls, views were divided.

The Journal poll also offered up a series of issues for which respondents were asked to pick the better candidates. The responses comported with what we’ve seen elsewhere: Harris has an advantage on health care; Trump on the economy. The biggest gap between the candidates was on immigration, where Trump had a 16-point edge.

That Trump is advantaged on immigration is also not new. He has enjoyed similar advantages consistently since the campaign began, one reason that he focuses so relentlessly on the issue in speeches and interviews. It’s worth noting, though, that other polling released this week suggests that Americans actually prefer the immigration proposals Harris has put forward.

Yahoo News on Wednesday published the results of a poll conducted by YouGov. In addition to asking respondents to evaluate policy proposals, it presented each candidate’s central argument on immigration in the form of quotes — unattributed quotes — from campaign speeches. Two-thirds of Americans agree with Harris’s framing of the issue as multipronged; just under half agreed with Trump’s more apocalyptic and hyperbolic articulation.

Even among Republicans, a majority agreed with Harris’s way of articulating the appropriate response.

YouGov also presented eight policy proposals that had been embraced by the candidates. Four came from the bipartisan border legislation that Harris has endorsed and that (as she frequently notes) Trump was instrumental in killing. Three come from Trump’s campaign rhetoric. The last suggested that undocumented immigrants be given a pathway to citizenship, something that earns a subtle reference on Harris’s campaign website.

The four proposals from the immigration bill endorsed by Harris were the four most-popular proposals overall, although “making it easier to expel immigrants” was about as popular as several other proposals. Three of the four least-popular proposals were Trump’s, including his pledge to round up, detain and deport millions of immigrants (though that was one of the ideas that was viewed about the same as “making it easier”).

So on ideology (as indicated by the question about campaign rhetoric) and on policy (as indicated on the chart above), Harris seems to have an advantage. But on the broader question of “immigration,” she continues to trail Trump.

One reason is that Harris is given more blame for the situation at the border than is Trump. Harris is vice president, meaning her power is necessarily more limited than that of President Joe Biden. It’s likely that her assumption of an immigration-related role within the administration — a move hyped by Trump (again hyperbolically) to suggest that she was centrally responsible for the border — drives a lot of this perception.

That Trump was president and didn’t build the wall the first time around, despite his promises, doesn’t spur nearly as much blame from Americans.

Part of what’s at play, clearly, is that a lot of voters simply view Trump as “tough on the border” and Harris as “not.” Fully three-quarters of respondents in the Yahoo-YouGov poll say that the border is a major problem or a crisis, and major problems and crises are not the sorts of things for which people appreciate nuanced responses.

It’s also probably the case that respondents simply don’t associate the proposals included in the bipartisan legislation with Harris, while they may associate her with proposals such as pathways to citizenship. On the flip side, of course, there is an ongoing under-appreciation of the destabilizing, arbitrary effects of a policy of mass deportation — advantaging Trump.

The border is seen as a crisis and Trump projects a blunt image of toughness, a vibe that effectively neutralizes Harris’s advantage on policy. The Yahoo-YouGov poll also asked respondents who they thought would do a better job handling immigration. These are the same people who preferred Harris’s broad approach and her specific endorsed policies, mind you.

Trump was preferred on immigration by 15 points.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

Previous Post

Why This S&P Support Level is SO IMPORTANT

Next Post

Retraction of Forecast Financial Information Plus Announcement on New Metallurgical Testwork Results

    Become a VIP member by signing up for our newsletter. Enjoy exclusive content, early access to sales, and special offers just for you! As a VIP, you'll receive personalized updates, loyalty rewards, and invitations to private events. Elevate your experience and join our exclusive community today!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent News

    Is a Chinese chain’s blood orange cold brew the future of coffee in America?

    Is a Chinese chain’s blood orange cold brew the future of coffee in America?

    July 8, 2025
    The Best Five Sectors, #26

    The Best Five Sectors, #26

    July 8, 2025
    Questcorp Mining Continues Exploration in Advance of Drilling at the La Union Gold & Silver Project in Mexico

    Questcorp Mining Continues Exploration in Advance of Drilling at the La Union Gold & Silver Project in Mexico

    July 8, 2025
    Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization Trade Resumption – STUD

    Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization Trade Resumption – STUD

    July 8, 2025

    Disclaimer: economicfinesse.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Browse by Category

    • Business
    • Investing
    • Politics
    • Stock

    Recent News

    Is a Chinese chain’s blood orange cold brew the future of coffee in America?

    Is a Chinese chain’s blood orange cold brew the future of coffee in America?

    July 8, 2025
    The Best Five Sectors, #26

    The Best Five Sectors, #26

    July 8, 2025
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2024 Economic Finesse. All Rights Reserved.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • About us
    • Home 1
    • Home 2
    • Home 3
    • Home 4
    • Home 5
    • Home 6
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Thank you

    Copyright © 2024 Economic Finesse. All Rights Reserved.